Exxon Mobil, the US oil giant, had recent annual revenues of
$438 Billion. It’s Samsung’s apparent goal to become the world’s first company
to have an annual revenue topping $1 Trillion. In this context, Exxon Mobil’s
annual revenues already exceed the GDP of Nigeria and Belgium (both about $414
Billion). Samsung’s target revenue would exceed the current GDP of all but 16
of the world’s largest economies, and today would fit in between Turkey (16th
largest at about $1.1 Trillion) and Iran (17th, $991 Billion).
Today, I can go and buy shares in Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM)
and thereby both participate in that firm’s fortunes and in the governance of
the firm (albeit, at my scale, that’s a faint voice). Samsung, in contrast, is
more difficult for me to invest in, since its shares (005930.KS, Seoul) aren’t
traded as much outside Korea, and the combine’s common stock shareholders have a
much weaker voice in governance. It’s the largest part of the Korean economy –
by far, creating considerable sensitivity about broad international trading of
this national asset and the potential implications for the nation’s economic
health should it be broadly traded elsewhere.
In these notes, I’m going to explore a few threads:
- That the roles generally ascribed to firms and to nations will evolve
- The potential for firms, as opposed to nations, to initiate hostilities – including wars.
- The implication for firms, instead of countries, setting the standards for social compacts
- The idea that shares in countries, and not just their bonds, could be traded on stock exchanges.
No comments:
Post a Comment